Guyton et al., 2015
Kathryn Z Guyton, Dana Loomis, Yann Grosse, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Chiara Scoccianti, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straif, on behalf of the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group, “Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate,” The Lancet, 2015, 16, DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70134-8.
ABSTRACT:
Not Avaialble
IARC, 2017
International Agency for Research on Cancer. “IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, volume 112. Glyphosate,” IARC; 2017.
ABSTRACT:
The IARC Monographs identify environmental factors that can increase the risk of human cancer. These include chemicals, complex mixtures, occupational exposures, physical agents, biological agents, and lifestyle factors. National health agencies can use this information as scientific support for their actions to prevent exposure to potential carcinogens. FULL TEXT
Center for Food Safety, 2012
Center for Food Safety, “Exposure to Herbicide Residues and Herbicide-Resistant Crops,” November 2012.
ABSTRACT:
Not Available
Hartzler et al., 2006
Bob Hartzler, Chris Boerboom, Glenn Nice, Peter Sikkema, “Understanding Glyphosate To Increase Performance: The Glyphosate, Weeds, and Crops Series,” Purdue Extension, 2006.
ABSTRACT:
Glyphosate and Roundup Ready® crops are popular because they provide consistent, broad spectrum weed control with minimal risk of crop injury. On occasion, however, growers experience poor weed control with glyphosate, generally because of application or weather-related factors. This publication examines the factors that affect glyphosate performance and offers management strategies to minimize fluctuations in its effectiveness. FULL TEXT
EPA, 2015
Environmental Protection Agency, “Updated Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA) Report for Glyphosate Case PC #s(103601, 103604, 103607, 103608, 103613,and417300),” Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, October 22, 2015.
ABSTRACT:
This memorandum transmits an updated Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA) report for the glyphosate case (previously completed in 2007). The usage data in the updated SLUA (2015) are an amalgamation of USDA/NASS and Private Pesticide Market Research data from 2005 to 2014. The new SLUA (2015) shows a decrease in usage, in terms of pounds a.i. and/or percent crop treated on apples, apricots, artichokes, avocados, broccoli, caneberries, cauliflower, grapefruit, garlic, nectarines, oranges, pasture, peaches, pears, pecans, and tangelos. The usage data did not change for cantaloupes, carrots, celery, lemons, oats, green beans, and pumpkins. The new SLUA (2015) shows an increase in usage, in terms of pounds a.i. and/or percent crop treated on the remainder of the SLUA crops. FULL TEXT
EPA, 1999d
Environmental Protection Agency, “Reassessed Group 3 Tolerances By Pesticide,” 1999.
ABSTRACT:
Lists the tolerances for multiple pesticides that were re-assessed between 1997-1999, including glyphosate. FULL TEXT
EPA, 1992a
Code of Federal Regulations, “Pesticide Tolerances and Food and Feed Additive Regulations for Glyphosate” (Summary), 40 CFR §§ 180-186, 1992
ABSTRACT:
SUMMARY: This document establishes tolerances and food and feed additive regulations for the combined residues of the herbicide glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) and its metabolite aminomethyl phosphonic acid. The specific proposals are: an amended tolerance in or on the raw agricultural commodities (RACs) soybeans from 6 parts per million (ppm) to 20 ppm; a tolerance on soybean straw at 20 ppm; a food additive regulation proposing increases in tolerances for the processed human food instant tea from 4.0 ppm to 7.0 ppm; a feed additive regulation for citrus molasses at 1 ppm; and amended feed additive tolerances for dried citrus pulp from 0.4 ppm to 1 ppm and soybean hulls from 20 ppm to 100 ppm. These regulations were requested by the Monsanto Co. and would establish the maximum permissible residues of the herbicide in or on these RACs, this processed human food, and these animal feed commodities. FULL TEXT
Schafer et al., 2004
Kristin S. Schafer, Margaret Reeves, Skip Spitzer, Susan E. Kegley, “Chemical Trespass: Pesticides in Our Bodies and Corporate Accountability,” Report by the Pesticide Action Network North America, May 2004.
ABSTRACT:
Not Available
DuPont Pioneer, 2015
DuPont Pioneer (Canada), “From seed to harvest 2015: Pioneer brand products and services,” 2015.
SUMMARY:
Industry brochure of products and services available in 2015 for Canadian farmers.
EPA, 2016
Code of Federal Regulations, “Glyphosate; tolerances for residues,” 40 CFR § 180.364, 2016.
ABSTRACT:
Tolerances are established for residues of glyphosate, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities listed below resulting from the application of glyphosate, the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the dimethylamine salt of glyphosate, the ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the potassium salt of glyphosate. Compliance with the following tolerance levels is to be determined by measuring only glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine).